🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating local support and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.