🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."